How Distracted Bus Drivers Cause Accidents in Texas
Every article on this site is researched by our internal team, reviewed for legal accuracy against current Texas law, and held to State Bar of Texas advertising standards before publication. We do not publish content that overstates outcomes or makes promises about results.
Learn more about our
editorial standards .
Key Takeaways
- A bus driver's phone use can establish negligence per se under Texas law.
- Bus companies are usually liable for a driver's distraction during the job.
- Government bus claims need written notice within six months, or 90 days for Houston Metro.
You were riding home on a city bus through Oak Cliff after a long shift when the driver glanced down at a phone and drifted into the next lane. The jolt threw you forward, and now you are dealing with pain, missed work, and questions no one prepared you for. You did nothing wrong, yet you are the one stuck with the bills. The first thing to understand is what actually counts as bus driver distraction in the eyes of the law.
Types of Distraction That Cause Bus Crashes
A bus driver’s distraction falls into three categories that courts and insurers treat as negligence: visual, manual, and cognitive. Each one pulls the driver’s focus away from a vehicle that can weigh more than 20,000 pounds.

Phone use, texting, and reaching for a GPS are the most recognizable. These take the driver’s eyes off the road and hands off the wheel at the same time. A driver checking a screen at highway speed travels the length of a football field while not watching the road.
Passenger and cabin distractions are just as dangerous. A driver settling a fare dispute, calming an unruly rider, or making stop announcements is not watching the road. The result is the same as a driver who looks down at a phone.
Then there are the distractions you can’t see. Route navigation stress, fatigue at the end of a long route, and simple inattention create the same legal risk as a distracted driving violation in Texas. A tired driver who runs a light is just as liable as one who was texting.
If you were hurt in a crash caused by any of these, your situation may be a bus accident claim worth reviewing with an attorney.
Federal CDL Rules Prohibit Distracted Driving
Commercial bus drivers face stricter rules than ordinary motorists, and if they break these rules, it can add weight to your legal claim. Federal law treats a bus driver’s phone use as a serious safety violation, not a minor lapse.

The FMCSA bans texting while operating a commercial vehicle under 49 CFR § 392.80. Violations bring civil penalties up to $2,750 for the driver and $11,000 for the carrier. The agency also prohibits holding, dialing, or reaching for a hand-held phone while driving under 49 CFR § 392.82.
State law adds another layer. The Texas Transportation Code § 545.4251 bans electronic messaging while driving any moving vehicle. When a driver violates that ban, it can establish negligence per se, which means the violation itself proves carelessness without further argument.
When a bus carries minor passengers, Texas Transportation Code § 545.425 goes even further. The operator may not use a wireless device at all unless the bus is stopped, with a narrow exception for device use that is part of the operator’s official driving duties, such as dispatch communication. That extra layer exists because the risk to children is too high to allow any margin.
The numbers explain why these rules are so strict. The agency’s research on commercial driver distracted driving found that commercial drivers who text are 23.2 times more likely to be involved in a safety-critical event.
Evidence That Proves a Bus Driver Was Distracted
Proving distraction relies on the data a commercial bus generates, much of which is not available in an ordinary car crash. The strongest evidence is often electronic, objective, and hard to dispute. Much of this data is overwritten or deleted within days or weeks, and moving quickly to secure it is essential.

Cell phone records and call logs
An attorney can subpoena these from the carrier to show active phone use at the moment of impact.
Black box and ELD data
Event data recorders capture speed, braking, GPS location, and driver behavior in the seconds before a crash.
Onboard camera footage
Interior and exterior cameras on transit buses often record the driver’s physical actions and the road conditions ahead.
Driver history and FMCSA records
Inspection reports, prior violations, and safety scores can show a pattern, drawn from sources like the large truck and bus statistics the agency publishes each year.
Employer Liability for a Distracted Bus Driver
The bus company itself, not just the driver, can be held responsible for a distracted driving crash. This often matters more to your recovery than the driver’s own fault, because the company usually carries far more insurance.
Under a rule called respondeat superior, an employer is liable when its driver causes harm while on the job. If the driver was on the clock and operating the route, the company can be held accountable.
Negligent hiring, negligent supervision, and negligent entrustment may also apply if a company puts a known risk behind the wheel. A company that ignored a driver’s history of phone use can be liable for that failure.
Government-operated systems work differently. Transit authorities like DART and Houston Metro fall under the Texas Tort Claims Act, which caps damages at $250,000 per person and requires written notice of your claim within six months of the accident. Houston Metro is stricter, requiring notice within 90 days under its city charter. Missing that window can end your claim before it starts.
Filing a Distracted Bus Driver Claim in Texas
You generally have two years from the date of your injury to file a claim against a private bus operator. Missing this deadline almost always ends your case for good.
Claims against government-operated buses move on a faster clock. You must give written notice within six months under the Tort Claims Act, and within 90 days if Houston Metro operated the bus. That notice deadline comes long before the two-year suit deadline, and missing it can bar your recovery entirely.
Comparative fault shapes what you ultimately recover. Bus companies routinely argue that you share the blame, because every percentage point they shift to you lowers what they pay. If you are found to bear more than 50 percent of the fault, you can’t recover any damages.
Talk to a Texas Bus Accident Attorney
A distracted bus driver who hurt you should not leave you carrying the cost alone. Angel Reyes & Associates has handled Texas bus accident claims for over 30 years, including cases against private carriers and government transit authorities. We offer free initial consultations and charge no fee unless we win. Our attorneys have recovered more than $1 billion for clients across Texas.
You can reach us 24/7, and we can handle most of your case remotely so you can focus on healing. Our client reviews show how we have stood with injured Texans through situations like yours.
Contact us today for a free consultation.
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a distracted bus driver lose their CDL over a texting violation?
Yes. Under federal rules, multiple convictions for texting or using a hand-held phone while driving a commercial vehicle are classified as serious traffic violations, and a driver can be disqualified from holding a CDL for up to 120 days.
Can I file a claim if I was a pedestrian or another driver hit by the bus, rather than a passenger?
Yes. Pedestrians and other drivers injured by a distracted bus driver can pursue the same negligence claim as a passenger. The duty of care a bus driver owes extends to anyone on or near the road, not only riders on board.
Does it matter that the bus was a private charter instead of a transit line?
It does. Private charter operators are not covered by the Texas Tort Claims Act, so there is no $250,000 damage cap and no government notice deadline. Federal rules also require interstate charter carriers to carry at least $5 million in liability coverage, which can mean more insurance available to pay a claim.
If the bus driver admitted to being distracted at the scene, does that help my case?
It can. A documented admission, especially one recorded in a police report, is useful evidence of negligence. That said, the driver or their employer may later dispute or walk back the statement, so electronic data like phone records and black box logs still matter.