Debt Collection Cases
At Heygood, Orr, Reyes, Pearson & Bartolomei, we represent
creditors and debtors in the collection cases involving
open accounts, contracts, guarantees and promissory
notes. In representing creditors, we know the importance
of debt collection to the ongoing operations of successful
businesses.Whether dealing with business or consumer debts, our firm has the expertise to help companies recover their losses in a timely and cost-efficient manner. In representing debtors, we are well versed in the law and procedure to reduce or eliminate liability. Our debt collection representation includes the following:
• Negotiation, mediation and arbitration
• Trial litigation
• Pre-judgment collections to obtain cash or collateral before undergoing judgment proceedings
• Post-judgment collections to pursue a debtor's assets after a judgment has been rendered
• Domestication of judgments in another state or country for local collection
If you or your company is in need of representation in a business litigation matter, please contact one of our attorneys by phone or email. To find out more about other cases we handle, select another case type on your left.
News Articles
HORP&B Obtain $3.0 Million Jury Verdict in Partnership Dispute
2/18/08 - Press Release
The Law Offices of Heygood, Orr, Reyes, Pearson & Bartolomei announced today the February 15th jury verdict in the amount of $3.0 million for their client, Tony Alardin, in a partnership dispute regarding the development, manufacture and sale of wireless video surveillance trailer systems. (read
more...)
Jenkens & Gilchrist Closing After Admitting Role in Tax Fraud
3/30/07 - The Dallas Morning News
Jenkens & Gilchrist, once the largest law firm in Dallas, has admitted promoting fraudulent tax shelters and will pay the Internal Revenue Service $76 million and go out of business, the IRS and the U.S. attorney in New York announced Thursday. (read
more...)
Non-compete Agreement Ruled No Basis for Damages
12/21/06 - New York Law Journal
A lawyer who signed a non-compete agreement with his former firm cannot claim damages on the grounds that the agreement is barred by New York state disciplinary rules, a Manhattan federal judge has ruled. (read
more...)