$359k
The insurer said she deserved nothing, then made a last-minute offer. We took it to a jury, and the jury awarded more than triple that.

$150k
The insurer offered $50,000 and tried to shift fault onto our client. We countered with indisputable facts until the number jumped.

Attorney Brian Romero secured a $150,000 settlement for a client whose vehicle was struck by a driver who lost control and swerved into their lane near a school. The client was driving around backed-up traffic when the impact occurred, pushing their car into another vehicle and leaving multiple cars damaged and the client injured.
Even though liability was clear, the at-fault driver’s insurer never offered more than $50,000. The insurer appeared to be leaning on two facts: the client was passing stopped traffic, and their car ended up hitting a second vehicle. Under Texas’s proportionate responsibility rules, any share of blame assigned to the injured person reduces their recovery, and anyone found more than 50 percent at fault recovers nothing, so even a small fault argument can be valuable to an insurance company.
Attorney Romero, working with pre-litigation paralegal Karina Gordon and litigation paralegal Elizabeth Rodriguez, kept the case centered on the driver who lost control and crossed into our client’s lane. Through aggressive negotiation and by countering the insurer’s fault arguments with indisputable facts, the team raised the settlement to $150,000, three times the highest pre-litigation offer.
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case is unique.
Talk to the team that takes cases seriously. Free, no-obligation review.
Get a Free Case Review